how to improve logistic sustainability
ASSIGNMENT 3: CASE STUDY
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowDue date: Time: Value: Length: Based on:
Sunday, 27 May 2018
23:59 hours (Australian Eastern Standard Time)
25%
2000 words ± 10%
Modules 8-10
Learning outcomes 1-3
Electronically through MyLO Assignment submission folder
Submission:
Before attempting this assignment:
Ensure the ‘Assessment’ section in this Unit Outline is read and understood. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the lecturer.
Students should refer to the ‘Guide to Assessment’ file under the Content tab on the unit MyLO site for guidelines on assignment presentation.
Ensure you understand the assignment question(s) and/or tasks. Once again, consult your lecturer should you be unsure of any matters.
Note: All students are required to submit this assignment to be eligible to undertake the final unit examination.
Task description & requirements
Complete the following task based on the attached case study Honeycutt Warehouse and Shipping Corporation (Wisner et al., 2019), knowledge learned in this unit and other relevant information.
Explain in details the tools, programmes or partnerships that Honeycutt Warehouse and Shipping Corporation can use to improve logistics sustainability.
[25 marks]
See the Essay/report assessment criteria sheet on the following page for information about the criteria and the standards by which your work will be judged.
Department of Maritime and Logistics Management – JNB522 Business Logistics 18
Case: Honeycutt Warehouse and Shipping Corporation
Source: Wisner, JD, Tan, K-C & Leong, GK 2019, Principles of supply chain management – a balanced approach, 5th edn, Cengage, Boston, MA.
Department of Maritime and Logistics Management – JNB522 Business Logistics 19
Student:
Unit code: JNB522 Assessor: Vera Zhang
Unit title: Business Logistics
ID:
Mark: / 25
Assignment 3 Marking Rubric
|
Assessment Criteria* |
HD |
DN (Distinction) |
CR (Credit) |
PP (Pass) |
NN (Fail) |
|
Explain the tools, programmes or partnerships to improve logistics sustainability |
Clearly explain with justification the potential tools/ programmes/ partnerships to improve logistics sustainability with external resources thoroughly researched and effectively applied |
Well explain with justification the potential tools/ programmes/ partnerships to improve logistics sustainability with external resources mostly researched and applied |
Mostly explain with justification the potential tools/ programmes/ partnerships to improve logistics sustainability with external resources reasonably researched and applied |
Partially/Shallowly explain with justification the potential tools/ programmes/ partnerships to improve logistics sustainability with limited or external resources |
Fail to identify and analyse the potential tools/ programmes/ partnerships to improve logistics sustainability with effective external resources overlooked or misunderstood |
|
Quality of research |
All relevant concepts etc clearly explained Evidence of wide reading & independent research |
Main concepts etc covered and clearly explained Range of resources used with discrimination |
Main concepts etc covered but some not clearly explained Reasonable use of some quality resources |
A number of important concepts etc overlooked or insufficiently described Limited use of some quality resources |
Majority of key concepts not addressed or misunderstood Little/no evidence of use of resources |
|
Quality of Communication |
Logical structure with coherent, concise well developed argument Correct use of grammar and technically error- free Acknowledged all sources Faultless application of prescribed style |
Well organised structure with argument, mostly logical, concise and coherent Mostly correct use of grammar and error-free Acknowledge main sources Mostly accurate referencing Prescribed style applied mostly correct |
Well organised structure and argument, generally logical, concise and coherent Some mistakes in the use of grammar and technical errors Acknowledge some sources Reasonably accurate referencing Prescribed style basically applied with numerous errors |
Generally organised structure and in some areas argument illogical and unclear Numerous grammar mistakes and technical errors Acknowledge few sources Significantly inconsistent referencing Inconsistent application of prescribed style |
Poor structure and argument generally illogical and unclear Difficult to read due to grammatical and technical errors Sources poorly acknowledged Incorrect referencing style Incorrect prescribed style |
* Please note that the criteria listed above are not necessarily of equal weighting, nor are they all-inclusive; they give an indication of your performance.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
